USCA4 Appeal: 25-6148 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6148

JUSTIN ANTONIO HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT FOUNTAIN; FRED ROBERTSON; WOODROW DAVID YANCEY; JOSH CLAYTON; SERGEANT HUMPHRIES; DEPUTY DAYE; OFFICER TAYLOR; OFFICER MANGUM; OFFICER ANDRE; SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS; NURSE KIM DOE; NATASHA DOE; LETECIA DOE; JANET DOE; DEION DOE; GRANVILLE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER; SAMANTHA BULL GORDON; JANE & JOHN DOES; WAYNE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; CAPT. JOHN DOE; SGT. CASEY; SGT. SHEAR; CPL. ROBERTS; OFFICER SMITH; OFFICER WILLIAMS; OFFICER CHRISTIE; OFFICER EASY; DOE WATSON; NURSE WHITFIELD; JENNIFER DOE; GRANVILLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE; JOHN DOE SURETY COMPANY; SERGEANT WALTON; SHERIFF JOHN DOE; MAJOR MOZINGO; GRANVILLE COUNTY; GRANVILLE COUNTY PARAMEDICS; GRANVILLE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER P.A. SAMANTHA BULL GORDON; SERGEANT GREEN; CPL.

ESTES; OFFICER LONG; ARAMARK; SH PARTNERS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:24-ct-03048-FL)

Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6148 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Antonio Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6148 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Justin Antonio Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P 41(b). We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Hawkins v. Fountain, No. 5:24-ct- 03048-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED