Jamaal Gittens v. Tripp Helms

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jamaal Gittens v. Tripp Helms

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1810 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1810

JAMAAL GITTENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TRIPP HELMS; STEVEN HIGDON; CHELSEY WILSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (3:25-cv-00407-KDB-DCK)

Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1810 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and conclude

that the district court properly dismissed the complaint upon finding that the defendants

were entitled to judicial immunity and prosecutorial immunity. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(iii). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gittens v. Helms,

No. 3:25-cv-00407-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. July 1, 2025). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished