Jamaal Gittens v. Tripp Helms
Jamaal Gittens v. Tripp Helms
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1810 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1810
JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRIPP HELMS; STEVEN HIGDON; CHELSEY WILSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (3:25-cv-00407-KDB-DCK)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1810 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint upon finding that the defendants were entitled to judicial immunity and prosecutorial immunity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gittens v. Helms, No. 3:25-cv-00407-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. July 1, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.