In re: Graham Schiff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 4, 2025

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-2047 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

No. 25-2047

Petitioner.

On Petition for Extraordinary Writ.

Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Graham Harry Schiff, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-2047 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

Graham Harry Schiff petitions this court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21 for an

extraordinary writ, seeking an order declaring unconstitutional or void and enjoining

enforcement of Exec. Order No. 14,347,

90 Fed. Reg. 43893

-94 (Sep. 5, 2025).

This court’s authority to issue extraordinary writs pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21 is

governed by the All Writs Act (the Act),

28 U.S.C. § 1651

. Under the Act, federal courts

“may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and

agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”

28 U.S.C. § 1651

(a). The Act “is a residual

source of authority to issue writs that are not otherwise covered by statute.” Carlisle v.

United States,

517 U.S. 416, 429

(1996) (internal quotation marks omitted). Thus,

petitioners may not resort to the Act, or to the common law writs it authorizes, when

another remedy is available. See

id.

Because another remedy is available to Schiff, he fails

to satisfy the requirements for relief under the Act. We therefore deny his petition for an

extraordinary writ. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.