Jerry King v. Honda Trading America Corporation
Jerry King v. Honda Trading America Corporation
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1731 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1731
JERRY KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HONDA TRADING AMERICA CORPORATION; PEOPLEREADY, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:22-cv-01720-JD)
Submitted: November 20, 2025 Decided: November 24, 2025
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry King, Appellant Pro Se. Nikole Setzler Mergo, Columbia, South Carolina, Kirsten Elena Small, MAYNARD NEXSEN PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Michael Brian Magargle, CONSTANGY, BROOKS, SMITH & PROPHETE, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1731 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry King appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to grant Defendants summary judgment on King’s discrimination,
harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because King’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. * See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177(4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* This forfeiture notwithstanding, we find no reversible error in the district court’s disposition. King v. Honda Trading Am. Corp., No. 4:22-cv-01720-JD (D.S.C. May 28, 2025).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished