Albert Blumberg v. Crystal Roney
Albert Blumberg v. Crystal Roney
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1790 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1790
ALBERT L. BLUMBERG, MD; BETH P. BLUMBERG,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
CRYSTAL RONEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-02531-GLR)
Submitted: November 20, 2025 Decided: November 24, 2025
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Crystal Roney, Appellant Pro Se. Nevin Lawrence Young, LAW OFFICES OF NEVIN L. YOUNG, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1790 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/24/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Crystal Roney seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting in part Plaintiffs
Albert and Beth Blumberg’s motion for partial summary judgment, denying Defendant
Home Mortgage Alliance Corporation’s motion for summary judgment, and denying
various motions for reconsideration and amendment of the court’s rulings. The Blumbergs
have moved to dismiss the appeal as an improper interlocutory appeal, noting that the case
has not reached a final disposition below.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46(1949). The orders Roney seeks to
appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly, we grant the Blumbergs’ motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished