Lloyd St. Rose v. Baltimore County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 25, 2025

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6638 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

No. 25-6638

Plaintiff - Appellant,

BALTIMORE COUNTY; OFFICER KAWONDA SEARS; DOES 1-9; SERGEANT STOCKSLAGER; MR. HARRIS; MS. SMITH; BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Adam B. Abelson, District Judge. (1:25-cv-00172-ABA)

Submitted: November 20, 2025 Decided: November 25, 2025

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd St. Rose, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6638 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/25/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

Lloyd St. Rose seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some of the

claims alleged in his amended

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint but allowing his conditions of

confinement claim to proceed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The

order St. Rose seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.