Lloyd St. Rose v. Baltimore County
Lloyd St. Rose v. Baltimore County
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6638 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6638
LLOYD ST. ROSE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY; OFFICER KAWONDA SEARS; DOES 1-9; SERGEANT STOCKSLAGER; MR. HARRIS; MS. SMITH; BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Adam B. Abelson, District Judge. (1:25-cv-00172-ABA)
Submitted: November 20, 2025 Decided: November 25, 2025
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd St. Rose, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6638 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/25/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Lloyd St. Rose seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some of the claims alleged in his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint but allowing his conditions of confinement claim to proceed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order St. Rose seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.