Timothy Torok v. Crystal Carter
Timothy Torok v. Crystal Carter
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6177 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/05/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6177
TIMOTHY TOROK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN CRYSTAL CARTER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:23-cv-02598-LKG)
Submitted: November 24, 2025 Decided: December 5, 2025
Before GREGORY and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Torok, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Lynn Micco, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6177 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/05/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Torok, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition, in which he challenged the execution of his sentence. In his
petition, Torok contended that the Bureau of Prisons wrongfully refused to apply earned
time credits under the First Step Act of 2018 (“FSA”) to his sentence because he is
designated as having an elevated risk of recidivism. He claimed that
18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4), which governs the amount of time credits an inmate may earn under the FSA,
does not restrict the application of earned time credits to an inmate’s sentence based on his
recidivism risk level. Torok thus argued that the Bureau of Prisons exceeded its authority
by not applying FSA time credits to his sentence.
Under § 3632(d)(4), an inmate can earn time credits for participation in recidivism
reduction programming, and such credits are applicable toward time in prerelease custody
or supervised release, if the inmate is eligible under
18 U.S.C. § 3624(g).
18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A), (C). Under § 3624(g), time credits toward prerelease custody or
supervised release can only be applied to inmates who have been designated as minimum
or low risk to recidivate for the previous two risk assessments.
18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(1)(D).
Torok does not dispute that he has been designated either high or medium risk for
recidivating throughout his incarceration. Because Torok’s recidivism risk level renders
him ineligible under § 3624(g), the Bureau of Prisons is statutorily authorized to deny the
application of Torok’s earned time credits to his sentence until he brings his recidivism risk
level down to minimum or low.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-6177 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/05/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Torok v. Carter, No. 1:23-cv-
02598-LKG (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished