USCA4 Appeal: 24-1066 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/10/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1066

WILLIAM DAVID JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN C. PHELAN, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:23-cv-00514-DJN)

Submitted: August 25, 2025 Decided: December 10, 2025

Before WILKINSON and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William David Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1066 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/10/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

William David Jones appeals the district court’s order awarding partial summary

judgment to the Secretary of the Navy, affirming the final decision of the Merit Systems

Protection Board, and dismissing without prejudice Jones’s retaliation claim under Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. * Limiting our review

of the record to the issues raised in Jones’s informal brief, we discern no reversible error.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey,

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal

brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny Jones’s motion to introduce new evidence

and for a hearing (ECF No. 10), and his motion for a default judgment (ECF No. 11), and

we affirm the district court’s order. Jones v. Del Toro, No. 3:23-cv-00514-DJN (E.D. Va.,

Dec. 22, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although Jones prematurely filed his notice of appeal, see Britt v. DeJoy,

(4th Cir. 2022) (en banc), we conclude that we have appellate jurisdiction under the doctrine of cumulative finality, see Houck v. LifeStore Bank,

, 271 (4th Cir. 2022).

2