U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Hamza Tebib v. Betty Tebib

Hamza Tebib v. Betty Tebib
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2025

Hamza Tebib v. Betty Tebib

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-2290 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/19/2025 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-2290

HAMZA TEBIB, individually and derivatively on behalf of his 2 business entities, Plaintiff - Appellant, and OWL HOUSE CAFE, LLC; OHCGRILL, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. BETTY LOU TEBIB; NOHA EL-WAHI; MORGAN GARRETT; ANGELLA WOOD; ZACK BRADSHAW; JOHN DOE 1, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:25-cv-00358-D-KS)

Submitted: December 11, 2025 Decided: December 19, 2025

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hamza Tebib, Appellant Pro Se.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-2290 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/19/2025 Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-2290 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/19/2025 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Hamza Tebib seeks to appeal the district court’s order striking his original complaint, dismissing his pending motions as moot, and giving him leave to amend. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Tebib seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.