United States v. Kawshie Chapman
United States v. Kawshie Chapman
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6744 Doc: 5 Filed: 12/23/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6744
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KAWSHIE LAMAR CHAPMAN, a/k/a Kwa, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (7:22-cr-00025-FL-4; 7:24-cv-00769- FL)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: December 23, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kawshie Lamar Chapman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6744 Doc: 5 Filed: 12/23/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Kawshie Lamar Chapman seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Chapman’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chapman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.