Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Prince George's County Police Department
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Prince George's County Police Department
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-2072 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/22/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2072
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, aka Ronald Satish Emrit; PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE SEPARATE FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897C, d/b/a Emrits of America,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DISTRICT COURT; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; MARYLAND SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE COURT OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, (MSBA); MAHASIN EL AMIN, Prince George’s County Clerk of the Court; JOSHUA SMITH; RACHEL DOMBROWSKI, Clerk of the Court; MARYLAND STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT; BOWIE POLICE DEPARTMENT; BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF MARYLAND, Kelly Hayes; MAYOR TIM ADAMS, of Bowie, Maryland,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:25-cv-02569-TDC)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: December 22, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. USCA4 Appeal: 25-2072 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/22/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-2072 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/22/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit (who also identifies himself as Presidential Candidate Number
P60005535) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without
prejudice for failing to correct deficiencies in the filing requirements of his case. We have
reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion by the district court. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b); Attkisson v. Holder,
925 F.3d 606, 625-27(4th Cir. 2019). Accordingly, we
deny Emrit’s motion to reinstate his case and affirm the district court’s order. Presidential
Candidate No. P60005535 v. Prince George’s Cnty. Police Dep’t, No. 8:25-cv-02569-TDC
(D. Md. Aug. 26, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished