Hadarou Sare v. Central Collection Unit
Hadarou Sare v. Central Collection Unit
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1890 Doc: 21 Filed: 12/22/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1890
HADAROU SARE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CENTRAL COLLECTION UNIT, (CCU); OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; TAX REFUND INTERCEPTION PROGRAM, (TRIP); UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (8:24-cv-03637-JRR)
Submitted: December 18, 2025 Decided: December 22, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hadarou Sare, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth C. Gauvey, Ariel Shaun Lichterman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1890 Doc: 21 Filed: 12/22/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Hadarou Sare appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to
dismiss Sare’s claims stemming from Defendants’ efforts to collect a debt. * We have
reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments Sare raises in his informal brief and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, Sare v. Central
Collection Unit, No. 8:24-cv-03637-JRR (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2025). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Defendant Central Collection Unit filed a motion to stay this appeal pending the district court’s decision on Sare’s postjudgment motion. The district court denied Sare’s motion on October 3, 2025, and we thus deny the motion to stay as moot.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished