U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2026

Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Hunter Blouin

Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Hunter Blouin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 29, 2026
Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Hunter Blouin

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6792 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6792

WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HUNTER BLOUIN, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:25-cv-11486-DCC-KFM)

Submitted: January 22, 2026 Decided: January 29, 2026

Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6792 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., appeals the district court’s order imposing filing restrictions due to Holtzclaw’s “voluminous, vexatious, and abusive filing practices.” On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holtzclaw’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Blouin, No. 6:25- cv-11486-DCC-KFM (D.S.C. Sep. 3, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.