U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2026

Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Wes Moore

Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Wes Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 23, 2026
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Wes Moore

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-2212 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/23/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-2212

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit, a/k/a Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897, d/b/a United Emrits of America, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WES MOORE, Governor D - Maryland; AISHA BRAVEBOY, Prince George’s County Executive; JAMIE RASKIN, Congressman D - Maryland; ANGELA ALSOBROOKS, Senator D - Maryland; CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Senator D - Maryland; ANTHONY BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:25-cv-03014-PX)

Submitted: February 19, 2026 Decided: February 23, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-2212 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/23/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit (who also identifies himself as Presidential Candidate Number P60005535) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that Emrit’s complaint failed to present a coherent claim for relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Presidential Candidate No. P60005535 v. Moore, No. 8:25-cv-03014-PX (D. Md. Sep. 17, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.