U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2026

Marcus Satterfield v. Rodney Chandler

Marcus Satterfield v. Rodney Chandler
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 24, 2026
Marcus Satterfield v. Rodney Chandler

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6605 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/24/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6605

MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAPTAIN RODNEY CHANDLER, Captain of Jail, sued in individual and official capacity; COUNTY COMMISSIONER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:25-cv-00384-WO-JLW)

Submitted: February 19, 2026 Decided: February 24, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Antonio Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6605 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/24/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Marcus Antonio Satterfield appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Satterfield’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that Satterfield’s claims are both barred by principles of res judicata and fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Satterfield v. Chandler, No. 1:25-cv-00384-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 14, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.