Ronnie Bullock v. James Hamby
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6708 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6708
RONNIE B. BULLOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES HAMBY, Dentist; D. BALL, N.P., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Senior District Judge. (7:23-cv-00337-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie B. Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Henry Schnetzler, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, Brittany Elizabeth Shipley, TIMBERLAKESMITH, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6708 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Ronnie B. Bullock appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motions for summary judgment and dismissing Bullock’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Bullock v. Hamby, No. 7:23-cv-00337- MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.