U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2026

Phillip Reeves v. Scotty Bodiford

Phillip Reeves v. Scotty Bodiford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2026
Phillip Reeves v. Scotty Bodiford

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6496 Doc: 15 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6496

PHILLIP C. REEVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCOTTY BODIFORD; DEHLEM COMPAGNA; KIMBERLY OLSZEWSKI; RICHARD GILLESPIE; OFFICER KIRKENDOLL; D. VALEZ; WILLIAMS ANDERSON; SERGEANT CROUCH, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge. (0:24-cv-06885-CMC-PJG)

Submitted: March 12, 2026 Decided: March 17, 2026

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Charles Reeves, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6496 Doc: 15 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Phillip C. Reeves seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order directing Reeves to file a second amended complaint containing all the claims he sought to pursue. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Reeves seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.