U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2026

Jose Argueta v. State of South Carolina

Jose Argueta v. State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2026
Jose Argueta v. State of South Carolina

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6990 Doc: 15 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6990

JOSE MARTIN ARGUETA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Jacquelyn Denise Austin, District Judge. (6:25-cv-12792-JDA)

Submitted: March 12, 2026 Decided: March 17, 2026

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Martin Argueta, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6990 Doc: 15 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Jose Martin Argueta appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Argueta’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice and without issuance or service of process. * See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Argueta v. South Carolina, No. 6:25-cv-12792-JDA (D.S.C. Nov. 13, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The order is final and appealable because the district court did not grant Argueta leave to amend his complaint. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.