Bradley Livingston v. Giant Food

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1644 Doc: 30 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1644

BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GIANT FOOD, Retail Store; AHOLD DELHAIZE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02588-PX)

Submitted: March 12, 2026 Decided: March 17, 2026

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Talmadge Livingston, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Charles Baldwin, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1644 Doc: 30 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Bradley Talmadge Livingston appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Livingston’s pending motions and affirm the district court’s order. Livingston v. Giant Food, No. 1:24-cv-02588-PX (D. Md. June 4, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED