United States v. Jermaine Holloway, Jr.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6677 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/01/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6677

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JERMAINE ALI HOLLOWAY, JR., a/k/a Glacierboi, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-cr-00461-D-1)

Submitted: April 28, 2026 Decided: May 1, 2026

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Ali Holloway, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6677 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/01/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Jermaine Ali Holloway, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motions for a sentence reduction filed in 2023 and 2024. * “We review a district court’s decision [whether] to reduce a sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling as to the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo.” United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Our review of the record reveals no error. The court clearly understood its authority to reduce Holloway’s sentence and recognized Holloway’s postsentencing conduct, but the court declined to grant a reduction based on its review of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Holloway’s informal brief recognizes receiving the district court’s August 7, 2025, order. However, he also alleged that his 2023 motion is still pending in the district court.

The court’s August 7 order clearly states that the court ruled on the 2023 and 2024 motions.