U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2026

Rodney Cobbs v. State of North Carolina

Rodney Cobbs v. State of North Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 1, 2026
Rodney Cobbs v. State of North Carolina

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6639 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/01/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6639

RODNEY ELROY COBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; TABOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; KAELYN N. SWEET, The Sweet Law Firm; SHERIFF EDWARD MCMAHON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:24-ct-03223-M-RJ)

Submitted: April 28, 2026 Decided: May 1, 2026

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney E. Cobbs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6639 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/01/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Rodney Elroy Cobbs appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Cobbs’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.