Timothy Arthur v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1554 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/12/2026 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1554
TIMOTHY WELDON ARTHUR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; NANCY WILLIAMS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:24-cv-04362-MGL)
Submitted: April 3, 2026 Decided: June 12, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Weldon Arthur, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1554 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/12/2026 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Timothy Weldon Arthur appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion to amend his complaint and declining to consider his untimely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his complaint without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Arthur v. Dep’t of Veterans Affs., No. 3:24-cv-04362- MGL (D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We limit our review to preserved issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). Arthur’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.