United States v. Martin Santillan

USCA4 Appeal: 26-6245 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/21/2026 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-6245

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARTIN VIDAL SANTILLAN, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 26-6363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARTIN VIDAL SANTILLAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00048-KDB-SCR-13)

Submitted: July 16, 2026 Decided: July 21, 2026 USCA4 Appeal: 26-6245 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/21/2026 Pg: 2 of 3

Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin Vidal Santillan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 26-6245 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/21/2026 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Martin Vidal Santillan appeals the district court’s orders denying his pro se motions for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Having carefully reviewed the record, we discern no reversible error in the district court’s orders. See United States v. Moody, 115 F.4th 304, (4th Cir. 2024) (explaining standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. United States v. Santillan, No. 5:18-cr-00048-KDB-SCR-13 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2026; Mar. 9, 2026). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED