In re: Magus Ahnend

USCA4 Appeal: 26-1726 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/21/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-1726

In re: MAGUS JAMYE REFICUL AHNEND, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. (5:26-cv-00199)

Submitted: July 16, 2026 Decided: July 21, 2026

Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 26-1726 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/21/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in Ahnend’s civil case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Ahnend’s case on June 25, 2026. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Ahnend’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED