Rhonda Jackson v. Edgefield County Water and Sewer Authority
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 26-1073 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/28/2026 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-1073
DR. RHONDA L. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDGEFIELD COUNTY WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY; HOPE CARROWAY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (8:25-cv-11324-DCC)
Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 28, 2026
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rhonda L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Melvin Thompson, III, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 26-1073 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/28/2026 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Rhonda L. Jackson appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jackson’s civil complaint as barred by res judicata.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jackson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.