U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2026

Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Upstate Properties

Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Upstate Properties
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 29, 2026
Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Upstate Properties

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1900 Doc: 29 Filed: 07/29/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1900

WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant, v.

UPSTATE PROPERTIES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:25-cv-02615-DCC) Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 29, 2026 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1900 Doc: 29 Filed: 07/29/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holtzclaw’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).

Accordingly, we deny Holtzclaw’s pending appellate motions, and we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.