U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1895

Crow v. Kimball Lumber Co.

Crow v. Kimball Lumber Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1895 · Bruce, McOormick, Pardee
69 F. 61; 16 C.C.A. 127; 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2360

Counsel

W. A. Blount, for plaintiffs in error., H. Bisbee, for defendant in error.

Crow v. Kimball Lumber Co.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As there was evidence tending to show that the agreement of December 30, 1889, was intended by the parties as an accord, which, when performed, was to be in satisfaction of the contract of May 20, 1889, and as it was conceded that under the said agreement of December 30, 1889, there was no performance, we are of opinion that the ruling of the circuit court, on the invitation of the defendants, plaintiffs in error here, on the effect of said agreement, was not erroneous; and as, on the other errors assigned and pressed in this court, we find for the defendant in error, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.