U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1897

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Holliday

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Holliday
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 7, 1897 · McCormick, Newman, White
83 F. 452; 27 C.C.A. 558; 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2102

Counsel

T; J. Freeman and W. T. Armistead, for plaintiff in error., Osear D. Scott, Paul Jones, and Sam S. Solinski, for defendants in error.

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Holliday

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Tke paragraphs of .the general charge to which exceptions were taken and on which error is assigned, considered as ■separate propositions, may be somewhat subject to criticism and require qualification; but considered in their relation to the whole charge, and to all the proof in the case, they do not present such misdirection to the jury as did or could have misled them in their application of the whole charge to the whole proof. The charges requested and refused, as far as they were sound and not calculated to mislead by giving undue prominence to certain features of the proof, are sufficiently embraced in the general charge of the court. Upon a full consideration of the whole case, we are satisfied that it was fairly submitted to the jury under sufficient and proper instructions, and that the judgment of the circuit court should be, and it is, affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.