In this suit, upon an account stated for work and labor done, merchandise, goods, and chattels sold, and for money paid at the instance of the defendant, the defense being that the suit is one to recover on gambling transactions, the questions argued in this court relate entirely to the rulings of the trial judge on the sufficiency of pleadings. On consideration, we find no prejudicial error in any of the rulings complained of, aDd the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.