Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Whilden
Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Whilden
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Note: The reversal of the judgment in such case does not necessarily set aside the verdict. The cause being remanded, the declaration may be amended so as to show jurisdiction. If jurisdictional averments are denied, that issue may be determined in the trial court. Atchison, T. & S. F. Railroad Company v. Gilliland, 193 Fed. 608, 113 C. C. A. 476.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO. v. WHILDEN
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Courts (§ 322*)—Declaration—Sufficiency—Jurisdiction. A declaration, stating that plaintiff is a citizen of Florida and that defendant is a “corporation and citizen of the state of Virginia,” is insufficient to show jurisdiction in a federal Circuit Court on the ground of diversity of citizenship. [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 876-881, 887; Dec. Dig. | 322.*] 2. Courts (§ 405*)—Reversal—Grounds—Jurisdiction. The Circuit Court of Appeals must reverse a judgment for plaintiff, where the record fails to show jurisdiction of the court below. [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 1097-1103; Dec. Dig. § 405.*]