Dieter-Wenzel Const. Co. v. Eppler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Dieter-Wenzel Const. Co. v. Eppler, 218 F. 987 (5th Cir. 1914)
133 C.C.A. 670; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620

Dieter-Wenzel Const. Co. v. Eppler

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

None of the assignments of error on this writ are well •taken. See City of Key West v. Baer, 66 Fed. 443, 13 C. C. A. 572; Adams v. New York Life Ins. Co., 113 Fed. 303, 51 C. C. A. 263; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 670, 5 Sup. Ct. 321, 28 L. Ed. 862; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 *988U. S. 71, 13 Sup. Ct. 481, 37 L. Ed. 373; Dooley v. Pease, 180 U. S. 126-131, 21 Sup. Ct. 329, 45 L. Ed. 457; Wilson v. Merchants’ Loan & Trust Co., 183 U. S. 121, 127 et seq., 22 Sup. Ct. 55, 46 L. Ed. 113; and also Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Curzi, 211 Fed. 580-587, 128 C. C. A. 180, and cases there cited. Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
DIETER-WENZEL CONST. CO. v. EPPLER
Status
Published