Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit /

1922

150 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opinions from 1922.

  • Wheeler v. Taft 279 F. 415, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Alderman v. United States 279 F. 259, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Hammers v. United States 279 F. 265, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Pratt v. United States 279 F. 263, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Riviera Realty Co. 279 F. 409, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Rowan v. United States 281 F. 137, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Calderon v. United States 279 F. 556, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Shipley v. United States 281 F. 134, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Texas Co. v. Pensacola Maritime Corp. 279 F. 19, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Livezey v. United States 279 F. 496, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • James v. United States 279 F. 111, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. S. H. Bolinger & Co. 279 F. 564, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Holbrook v. Shepard 279 F. 193, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Forbes v. Allen 134 N.E. 244, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Falgout v. United States 279 F. 513, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Brooks-Callaway Co. v. Macon Concrete Roller Co. 279 F. 114, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Compania De Navegacion Interior, S. A. v. Boston-Virginia Transp. Co. 278 F. 868, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Fontenot v. Accardo 278 F. 871, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Ritchie v. W. G. Strange Oil & Refining Co. 279 F. 49, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Payne v. United States 279 F. 112, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Riddle v. United States 279 F. 216, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Berthelot v. Isaacson 278 F. 921, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Myers v. Moore-Kile Co. 279 F. 233, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Frank Hemingway, Inc. v. Southport Mills, Ltd. 279 F. 237, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Marks Ribbon Co. v. Pilsbury 278 F. 161, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Loisel v. Mortimer 277 F. 882, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Ford v. Grimmett 278 F. 140, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Cross State Land Co. v. Pruett 278 F. 143, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Bank of Plant City 278 F. 178, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Kirklin v. Ellerbe 278 F. 168, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Biles v. Gandy 278 F. 150, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Dominion Phosphate Co. v. Lang 278 F. 159, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Gillespy 277 F. 641, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • McCarroll v. Newsham 278 F. 4, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • St. Louis Bank Equipment & Fixture Co. v. Bank of Rolling Fork 277 F. 774, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Pensacola Shipping Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. 277 F. 889, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Orange Ice, Light & Water Co. v. Texas Compensation Ins. 278 F. 8, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Producers' Naval Stores Co. v. McAllister 278 F. 13, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United States 277 F. 894, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Lyons v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. 278 F. 144, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Norris, Inc. v. M. H. Reed 278 F. 19, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Inmon v. Mississippi ex rel. Ivy 278 F. 23, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Torrey v. United States 278 F. 177, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Pearson v. Mallory S. S. Co. 278 F. 175, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Alex Hyman & Co. v. Hay 277 F. 898, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Geitgey v. Henderson 277 F. 426, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Williams v. Travis 277 F. 134, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Pensacola 277 F. 429, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Bostwick v. Turner Const. Co. 277 F. 759, (5th Cir. 1922)
  • Talge Mahogany Co. v. Nicklas 277 F. 674, (5th Cir. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑