U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1927

Texas Co. v. Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 3, 1927

16 F.2d 1022; 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3708 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Hampden Story, of Shreveport, La., and A. P. Pujo, of Lake Charles, La. (Hampden Story, of Shreveport, La., A. P. Pujo, and Pujo & Bell, all of Lake Charles, La., and Fred L. Williams, of Houston, Tex., on the brief), for appellants., S. W. Plauche and Cullen R. Liskow, both of Lake Charles, La., and Eldon S. Lazarus, of New Orleans, La. (S. W. Plauche, Cullen R. Liskow, C. A. McCoy, all of Lake Charles, La., and Eldon S. Lazarus, of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Campo v. LaNasa (La. Ct. App. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The result of a careful consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel in this case is that we reach the same conclusion which is evidenced by the decree appealed from. The opinion rendered by the District Judge (Texas Co. v. Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co., 12 F.[2d] 297) sufficiently states reasons justifying the refusal to grant any relief prayed for, except that which was granted by that decree, and we think that further discussion of the questions involved would be superfluous.

The decree is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.