U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1930

Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday

Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 7, 1930 · Walker, Bryan, Foster
37 F.2d 407; 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2564 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Emil Corenbleth, of Dallas, Tex., for appellants., Robert Allan Ritchie and Fred J. Dudley, both of Dallas, Tex. (Dabney, Goggans & Ritchie, of Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for appellees.

Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a discharge in bankruptcy to appellants on the ground that they had failed to explain satisfactorily losses of assets and the deficiency of assets to meet their liabilities at the time of adjudication as bankrupts. Section 14b(7) Bankruptcy Act as amended by the Act of May 27, 1926 (11 USCA § 32).

This ease presents purely a question of fact. The District Court in 37 F.(2d) 403 reviewed the material facts and reached the conclusion that a discharge should be withheld. It would serve no good purpose to again review the facts. It is enough to say that the record supports the conclusion reached by the District Court.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.