U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1934

Ryan v. Panama Refining Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 22, 1934 · Sibley

71 F.2d 8; 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3007 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Chas. I. Francis Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., John R Davis of Washington, D. C., S. D. Bennett, U. S. Atty., of Beaumont, Tex., and Douglas Arant, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for appellants, F. W. Fisher of Tyler, Tex., for appelees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

President of United States v. Artex Refineries Sales Corp. (District Court, S.D. Texas 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge,

This ease was tried in the District Court and in this court along with that of Ryan v. Amazon Petroleum Corporation et ah, 71 F. (2d) 1, the appeal in which has just been disposed of. The cases are similar except that this embraces among its complainants certain refiners of oil who ship some of their products in interstate commerce and who attack also Regulation Y of the Secretary of the Interior which provides for reports to be made by refiners. The present decree en-joined the enforcement of that Regulation also. What was said by us in the opinion in the case of Amazon Petroleum Corporation applies here, and for the reasons there set forth we reverse the decree in this ease and remand the cause with direction to dismiss the bill.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.