Lykes Bros. SS. Co. v. Grubaugh
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)
- Brown v. APL Maritime Ltd. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2024)
- Brown v. APL Maritime Ltd. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2023)
- Fountain v. John E. Graham & Sons (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 1993)
- Nilsson v. American Oil Co. (District Court, S.D. Texas 1954)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appellee in his motion for rehearing calls to our attention that while our opinion held that the claim for damages was not made out and did not so hold as to the claim for maintenance and cure, the order entered by us was a general judgment, reversing not only as to the award of damages but also as to that for maintenance and cure. Urging that it was error not to affirm the judgment as a whole, he insists that in any event it should have been affirmed as to the recovery for maintenance and cure.
While we cannot agree with appellee that the judgment should have been affirmed throughout, we do agree with him that the recovery for maintenance and cure should be affirmed. The motion for rehearing is therefore granted to that extent and the order heretofore entered reversing the judgment of the District Court is modified so as to order the affirmance of the judgment as to the allowance of maintenance and cure and to limit its reversal to the award of damages.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.