House v. Mayo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
House v. Mayo, 151 F.2d 1014 (5th Cir. 1945)
1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3068

House v. Mayo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The district judge, in an opinion 63 F. Supp. 169, carefully setting out the applicable principles of law and as carefully reviewing the facts, has found that the petitioner did not make out a case for release on habeas corpus from confinement in the state penitentiary. Upon a careful examination of the record, we are convinced that his findings are well supported and that the judgment should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Albert R. HOUSE v. Nathan MAYO, State Prison Custodian of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published