The applicant for the writ of habeas corpus not having exhausted his remedies in the State courts, the District Judge properly declined to interfere. Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 116, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672, 681, 68 S.Ct. 1270.

Judgment affirmed.