American Automobile Ins. Co. v. Ryle
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Dunham v. Robertson (10th Cir. 1952)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The suit, brought under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Act, Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq., was for damages for the willfull beating of one Francis J. Finney, an employee of Kelly Sales & Coffee Company, which carried workmen’s compensation insurance with the plaintiff.
Defendant, alleging that Finney, the injured employee, was a citizen of Texas, was a joint owner of the cause of action sued on, and was, therefore, an indispensable party, whose joinder would defeat the jurisdiction, moved to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
The district judge sustained the motion and plaintiff is here appealing from the judgment, insisting that the questions raised below and sought to be raised here are foreclosed against the contention of want of jurisdiction by the decision of this court in Orange Ice, Light & Water Co. v. Texas Comp. Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 278 F. 8.
Appellee urges upon us that the invoked decision is no longer, authoritative because *831 the Texas Statute has been significantly amended, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Rule 19, 28 U.S.C.A. have been adopted since that decision.
We agree with appellant that neither the amendment of the Texas Statute, nor the adoption of the Rules of Civil Procedure have in any way impaired or affected the authority of the Orange Ice, L. & W. Co. case, and that the suit was wrongly dismissed.
The judgment is, therefore, reversed and the cause is remanded for further and not inconsistent proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.