U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1951

National Labor Relations Board v. Eva-Ray Dress Mfg. Co., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eva-Ray Dress Mfg. Co., Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 17, 1951 · Hutcheson, Holmes, Strum
191 F.2d 850 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William M. Pate, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Atlanta, Ga., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., NLRB, Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Arnold S. Kaye, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eva-Ray Dress Mfg. Co., Inc.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Though this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board was filed in this court on May 25, 1951, and the case was duly set by order of the court for hearing in Atlanta on October 8, 1951, and notice thereof given, no answer to the petition was filed by the respondents.

On the date set for hearing, the Board appeared by its counsel and announced ready to proceed, but the respondents appeared not, either in person or by counsel.

Whereupon the court took the petition under consideration upon the record, the brief, and the appearance of counsel for the board, and no cause of any kind having been shown why the order of the board should not be enforced as entered, and it appearing to the court from the petition and brief of the board, in the light of the record, that the petition should be granted and an appropriate decree entered directing the enforcement of the board’s order, it is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.