Mrs. Florence Karno v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Radosta v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (La. Ct. App. 1964)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In an action on a policy of life insurance tried to the court without a jury, the district court entered judgment for the defendant, fully stating the facts and its conclusions as to the law in an opinion reported in D.C., 137 F.Supp. 893, et seq. None of the findings of fact is clearly erroneous, Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Indeed, our re-examination causes us to agree both with the facts and with the law so ably stated in the opinion of the district court. Its judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.