U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1958

Estate of W. Y. Brame, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Estate of W. Y. Brame, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 3, 1958 · Hutcheson, Borah, Rives
256 F.2d 343 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

De Quincy V. Sutton, 0. Winston Cameron, Meridian, for petitioners., Joseph Kovner, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Robert N. Anderson, Attys., Nelson P. Rose, Chief Counsel, I. R. S., Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Estate of W. Y. Brame, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Cases that cite this one

34 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Tax Court’s findings of fact and opinion reported at 25 T.C. 824 contain a careful analysis of the issues and of the contentions made by the taxpayers. A thorough consideration of the briefs and arguments in connection with the voluminous record and the many exhibits convinces us that there were no signifi *344 cant procedural errors, and that the Tax Court’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence, and certainly are not clearly erroneous. 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C. 1954) 7482(a). We agree with the Tax Court’s opinion. To write more would serve no useful purpose. The decision of the Tax Court is correct, and it is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.