Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1960

Mary Ellen Francis Vernon and Husband, H. J. Vernon v. Union Oil Company of California

Mary Ellen Francis Vernon and Husband, H. J. Vernon v. Union Oil Company of California
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 11, 1960 · Rives, Cameron, Jones
273 F.2d 178 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

W. H. Brian, Amarillo, Tex., Albert Smith, Lubbock, Tex., for appellants., H. A. Berry, W. M. Sutton, Riley Strickland, Amarillo, Tex., for appellee.

Mary Ellen Francis Vernon and Husband, H. J. Vernon v. Union Oil Company of California

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

273 F.2d 178

Mary Ellen Francis VERNON and husband, H. J. Vernon, Appellants,
v.
UNION OIL COMPANY of California, Appellee.

No. 17502.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1960.

W. H. Brian, Amarillo, Tex., Albert Smith, Lubbock, Tex., for appellants.

H. A. Berry, W. M. Sutton, Riley Strickland, Amarillo, Tex., for appellee.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petitions for rehearing in the above styled and numbered cause are hereby

2

Denied.

3

JONES, Circuit Judge (dissenting in part).

4

I would grant the appellees' petition for rehearing and deny the petition for rehearing of the appellants.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.