U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1960

George Saba and Edward D. Feurtado v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 12, 1960 · Jones, Per Curiam, Rives, Tut-Tle

282 F.2d 255 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

J. Edward Worton, Miami, Fla., for appellants., David C. Clark, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

DiBella v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1962)
DiBella v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1962)
United States v. Daniel J. Koenig (5th Cir. 1961)
United States v. James Murphy and Robi Mercer (3d Cir. 1961)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying motions of the appellants to suppress and for return of property seized, incident to the arrest of appellants for offenses presently being prosecuted by criminal information. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment of the district court was interlocutory and not appealable. We agree. See Zacarias v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 261 F.2d 416, certiorari denied 359 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 650, 3 L.Ed.2d 637; Peterson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 260 F.2d 265.

The appeal is therefore

Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.