Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1960

Harry S. Getchell, Hollis Rinehart, William F. Powers and Francis E. Getchell v. United States

Harry S. Getchell, Hollis Rinehart, William F. Powers and Francis E. Getchell v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 22, 1960 · Tuttle, Rives, Tut-Tle, Brown
283 F.2d 695 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Cody Fowler, Walter Humkey, Harvie •S. DuVal, Emmett W. Kehoe, Miami, Fla., Paul Kiekliter, Herbert S. Phillips, Tampa, Fla., Chester Bedell, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant., James Guilmartin, U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Harry S. Getchell, Hollis Rinehart, William F. Powers and Francis E. Getchell v. United States

Opinion

283 F.2d 695

Harry S. GETCHELL, Hollis Rinehart, William F. Powers and Francis E. Getchell, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17338.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 22, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Joseph P. Lieb, Judge.

Cody Fowler, Walter Humkey, Harvie S. DuVal, Emmett W. Kehoe, Miami, Fla., Paul Kickliter, Herbert S. Phillips, Tampa, Fla., Chester Bedell, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

James Guilmartin, U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petition for rehearing in the above styled and numbered cause, 282 F.2d 681, is hereby

2

Denied.

3

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

4

I dissent from the order denying the petition for rehearing. I am of the opinion that the rehearing should be granted and the original judgment of this Court be modified in accordance with the views expressed by me in my dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.