U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1961

Bloomfield Steamship Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Bloomfield Steamship Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 23, 1961 · Jones, Mize, Per Curiam, Tuttle
285 F.2d 431 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

C. W. Wellen, William M. Ryan, Charles W. Hall, Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for petitioner., Morton K. Rothschild, Harold M. Seidel, Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Claude R. Marshall, Sp. Atty., Hart H. Spiegel, Chief Counsel, I. R. S., Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Justice, for respondent.

Bloomfield Steamship Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this controversy, involving a liability of the petitioner for Federal income taxes, and the Tax Court’s reasons for its decision against the petitioner are set forth in the Tax Court’s opinion. Bloomfield Steamship Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 33 T.C. 75. We find no error in the conclusions reached by the Tax Court and its decision is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.