U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1961

Milton J. Harris v. S. H. Kress & Co., A/K/A S. H. Kress and Company

Milton J. Harris v. S. H. Kress & Co., A/K/A S. H. Kress and Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 16, 1961 · Tuttle, Rives, Jones
287 F.2d 878; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5083 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Burton B. Loebl, Miami Beach, Fla., William A. Stern, II., Miami, Fla., for appellant., Louis S. Bonsteel, Miami, Fla., Smath-ers, Thompson & Dyer, Miami, Fla., of counsel, for appellee, S. H. Kress & Co.

Milton J. Harris v. S. H. Kress & Co., A/K/A S. H. Kress and Company

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

  • Chester v. Ross (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The parties submitted motions for summary judgment based on an exchange of letters which the appellant contends constituted a contract engaging him as a broker at 5% commission to find a tenant for appellee’s store property. We think it is clear that the correspondence amounted only to preliminary negotiations that did not ripen into a contract. This follows from the fact that appellant would be entitled to a commission only if he found a lessee who was ready, able and willing to execute a lease upon terms prescribed by appellee. The terms of such a lease were never agreed upon.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.