U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1961

Southern Premium Stamp Company v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 9, 1961 · Rives, Jones, Brown

289 F.2d 319; 7 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1895; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4564 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Ed G. Barham, Valdosta, Ga., Eberhardt, Franklin, Barham & Coleman, Valdosta, Ga., for appellant., Charles B. E. Freeman, Lee A. Jackson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Abbott M. Sellers, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Frank O. Evans, U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., I. Henry Kutz, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Earle B. May, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Wilson Chemical Co. v. United States (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issues on this appeal are accurately stated in the opinion of the district court, Southern Premium Stamp Company v. United States, 191 F.Supp. 158. The disposition of these issues and the authorities which establish the controlling principles are clearly set forth in the district court’s opinion and its judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.